bug#81533: c-ts-mode: Improved block comment indentation

> Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 21:59:40 +0200
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
> From: Björn A. Lindqvist <[email protected]>
> 
> On 8/15/26 15:23, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I was about to install this, but this patch breaks the c-ts-mode
> > tests:
> > 
> >    Test c-ts-mode-test-indentation backtrace:
> >      signal(ert-test-failed (("Mismatch in test \"Multiline Block Comment
> >      ert-fail(("Mismatch in test \"Multiline Block Comments 2 (bug#60270)
> >      ert-test--erts-test(((code lambda nil (c-ts-mode) (setq-local indent
> >      ert-test-erts-file("d:/gnu/git/emacs/trunk/test/lisp/progmodes/c-ts-
> >      #f(lambda () [t] (let* ((fn-0 #'treesit-ready-p) (args-1 (condition-
> >      #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode 0x1ea918ef364892c1>)()
> >      handler-bind-1(#f(compiled-function () #<bytecode 0x1ea918ef364892c1
> >      ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
> >      ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name c-ts-mode-test-indentation :documenta
> >      ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector ... :tests ... :test-m
> >      ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp))) #f(compil
> >      ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp))))
> >      ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativeco
> >      eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit '(not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :n
> >      command-line-1(("-L" ";." "-l" "ert" "--eval" "(setq treesit-extra-l
> >      command-line()
> >      normal-top-level()
> >    Test c-ts-mode-test-indentation condition:
> >        (ert-test-failed
> >         ("Mismatch in test \"Multiline Block Comments 2 (bug#60270)\", file d:/gnu/git
> >    /emacs/trunk/test/lisp/progmodes/c-ts-mode-resources/indent.erts"
> > 	"/*\n   some comment\n */\n" "/*\n  some comment\n */\n"))
> >       FAILED  2/4  c-ts-mode-test-indentation (0.207103 sec) at lisp/progmodes/c-ts-mode-tests.el:26
> > 
> > Could you please amend the code or the test to avoid the breakage, and
> > then resubmit?
> 
> Sure, attached a new patch wit the tests fixed.

Hmm... looks exactly like the previous patch to me.  Are you sure you
sent the right patch?

> > Also, these changes are close to the limit of what we are able to
> > accept from you without the copyright-assignment agreement.  If you
> > agree to start the assignment paperwork at this time, I will send you
> > the form to fill and the instructions to go with it.
> 
> Sure, go ahead!

Form sent off-list.