bug#81643: 32.0.50; use-package :hook is not the same as :init add-hook

> From: John Wiegley <[email protected]>
> Cc: Lucas Jimenez <[email protected]>,  [email protected]
> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:43:00 -0700
> 
> The original reporter is correct: If the manual implies that `:hook' is the
> same as using `add-hook' in a `:init' block, then it should be correctly to
> say that this depends on whether (1) the nature of the use-package macro
> causes auto-deferral to happen, and (2) there is code in a `:config' block
> that would thusly be deferred.
> 
> Maybe it’s best to just drop this statement from the manual.

There's no such statement in the manual.  It is a conjecture, probably
from the following excerpt:

      You can also provide a list of hooks.  When multiple hooks should be
   applied, the following examples are all equivalent:

	(use-package company
	  :hook (prog-mode text-mode))

	(use-package company
	  :hook ((prog-mode text-mode) . company-mode))

	(use-package company
	  :hook ((prog-mode . company-mode)
		 (text-mode . company-mode)))

	(use-package company
	  :commands company-mode
	  :init
	  (add-hook 'prog-mode-hook #'company-mode)
	  (add-hook 'text-mode-hook #'company-mode))

Are the examples incorrect?