bug#81636: Fix switch-to-buffer-other-*

>> Yes, I replaced it with the new argument 'interactive'.
>> These changes are intended only for interactive use
>> of *-other-* commands.
>
> But the doc-string of 'interactive' warns against such use.
> Or do I misunderstand it?

No, there is no such warning.  Contrary to this,
the docstring of 'called-interactively-p' suggests:

  Instead of using this function, it is cleaner and more reliable to
  give your function an extra optional argument whose interactive spec
  specifies non-nil unconditionally ("p" is a good way to do this), or
  via (not (or executing-kbd-macro noninteractive)).