Re: C structs and Semantic aren't working well together

On 09/12/2014 11:14 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Well, as the subject says, C structs are broken in Semantic.
>
> Take the code for example:
>
> struct Foo
> {
>          int Bar;
> };
    ^
    \ right here

> int main()
> {
>          struct Foo Baz;
>          Ba -- Cannot find completion for `"Ba"'
>          Baz. -- Cannot find types for `"Ba"'
>          return 0
> }
>
> What makes it even weirder is that it pretty much works(?, I haven't
> tried structs on headers, but functions on headers works), except for
> the fact that if you declare a struct inside the code itself, it fails.

Hi,

If I put a semi-colon at the end of the declaration (see above) 
everything "works for me".

Are there variants that don't need a semi-colon?

I like using `global-semantic-decoration-mode'.  It will highlight 
declarations like that struct.  If it isn't over-lined, then you know 
Semantic can't complete on it.

Eric

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk