Re: emacs-31 0818bb3eb38: ; * etc/NEWS: Presentational fixes and improvements.
Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: Michael Albinus <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:29:45 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: > > Hi Eli, > > > This change is incorrect, and should be reverted. Our conventions are > > to up-case the function keys specified as <KEY>, as in <RIGHT> and > > <DOWN>. This follows what makeinfo produces for these keys in the > > Info format. > > I follow what describe-function shows: That's not Info. > I follow what the Elisp manual shows, for example in (info "(elisp) > Function Keys") or (info "(elisp) Changing Key Bindings"). Which parts of that? I alluded to what @key produces. It sounds like you are looking at other markups. Please look at (info (emacs) Moving Point") > I follow what is the practice in etc/NEWS *since ever*, except one entry > in NEWS.27. Better late than never... > Btw, a plain revert would be wrong anyway. I've fixed also the wrong > keybindings for window-layout-flip-topdown and > window-layout-flip-leftright ('C-x w f ...' instaed of 'C-x w r ...'). It's okay to revert only the part that deals with arrow keys. I can do it myself if you want.