LLM as assistant for code design idea generation (was: On keybindings and the slow erosion of help's utility)

Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.devel
Message-ID <87v7ae6wgk.fsf@localhost>
Richard Stallman <[email protected]> writes:

>   > However, FYI, what I posted is a
>   > result of several dozens of iterations, later edited by me, and produced
>   > with LLM specifically tuned to be more straight to the point.  I could
>   > rewrite it myself, but that would honestly not gain much.
>
> I think you mean it would not be a big technical improvement in the
> code -- right?  That may be so, but it's a different issue.

No. The code quality is honestly completely irrelevant. That code is not
serious and is more or less a pseudo-code. It is there simply for an
illustration of the ideas.

> However, this sort of working together with an LLM may be useful to
> discuss specifically in the development of the criteria we are working
> on.

That's exactly what I used LLM for - throw my ideas, ask for critique,
brainstorm suggestions, just to refuse LLM suggestions and come up with
my own, etc. I also used it to generate examples how the concept would
look like if applied to typical dynamic keymap situation we discussed.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode maintainer,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.