Re: reading LLM code may rule out white room re-implementation; was: On keybindings and the slow erosion of help's utility
Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <874ihx7fr2.fsf@localhost> |
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> writes: > If you post code you do own in here, I’m pretty sure that lawyers could > make a legal argument that your intention was for others to understand > it, so no white room re-implementation would be needed, just one that’s > not a copy. Sorry, I am not going to start *that* discussion on the public list. I just wanna say that the situation is not so obvious legally wrt the scenario you described. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>