Re: LLM Commit in upstream `master`?!

Thanos Apollo <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:45:22 +0300

Newsgroups	gmane.emacs.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]> writes:

> Thanos Apollo <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Is it ok to stop the luddite paranoia with LLMs now?
>
> The Luddites were right.

They were so right that 'Luddite' became synonymous with clear-sighted
technological foresight.

> That said, the Luddites concerns do not apply to LLMs, so this kind of
> comparison is not really applicable.
>
> The concern with LLMs is about the legal status of their output, and
> this concern is not yet resolved to my awareness.

And yet an Emacs contributor has just pushed a commit co-authored by
Claude.  I suppose the next step is to screen-record every contributor,
lest someone use one of these tools without properly confessing it.

-- 
Thanos Apollo ☧
https://thanosapollo.org

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832 B)