Re: LLM Commit in upstream `master`?!

Yuan Fu <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:32:45 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

> On Jul 25, 2026, at 12:21 PM, Sean Whitton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yuan Fu [25/Jul 12:13pm -07] wrote:
>> And reading the thread more, I’m a bit confused: does the hand-written
>> policy apply to commit messages? My understanding is that all code and
>> prose must by hand-written. Sorry if I’m not catched up on the policy.
> 
> Yes, it applies to those.  Remember that we export them as ChangeLog files.
> 
> So just to confirm, only the commit message was LLM-authored, nothing else?

Right.

> Eli, what do you think we should do?  Should we ask the Savannah admins
> to help us forcefully undo this commit, or is it enough just to replace
> the entry in the ChangeLog file exported after cutting the emacs-32
> release branch?
> 
> I think the commit message saying co-authored by Claude even though the
> code in the commit was not co-authored by the LLM is a problem because
> we have no way of telling people that, in fact, this commit is not
> LLM-authored.  So I worry that people will keep finding it and then
> coming to the list to ask about it.  So I think that we should consider
> asking the Savannah admins for help.

Sorry for the trouble!

Yuan