Re: LLM Commit in upstream `master`?!
Yuan Fu <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:32:45 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Jul 25, 2026, at 12:21 PM, Sean Whitton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yuan Fu [25/Jul 12:13pm -07] wrote: >> And reading the thread more, I’m a bit confused: does the hand-written >> policy apply to commit messages? My understanding is that all code and >> prose must by hand-written. Sorry if I’m not catched up on the policy. > > Yes, it applies to those. Remember that we export them as ChangeLog files. > > So just to confirm, only the commit message was LLM-authored, nothing else? Right. > Eli, what do you think we should do? Should we ask the Savannah admins > to help us forcefully undo this commit, or is it enough just to replace > the entry in the ChangeLog file exported after cutting the emacs-32 > release branch? > > I think the commit message saying co-authored by Claude even though the > code in the commit was not co-authored by the LLM is a problem because > we have no way of telling people that, in fact, this commit is not > LLM-authored. So I worry that people will keep finding it and then > coming to the list to ask about it. So I think that we should consider > asking the Savannah admins for help. Sorry for the trouble! Yuan