Re: LLM Commit in upstream `master`?!
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:37:10 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jim Porter [25/Jul 1:27pm -07] wrote: > Going forward, what do people think about adding a Git commit message > hook to check for this? That way, we can catch honest mistakes and > remind the committer of our policies. (To preempt the obvious response: > people could of course lie about whether they used LLMs, but we already > place a lot of trust in people with commit access, so I'm willing to > trust them on this as well. Anyone who knowingly broke our trust over > this or something else should probably lose commit access.) > > If there's interest in a Git hook, I could make the necessary changes, > since I've already done some work on the Git hooks before. Yes please. Given that we don't use Co-Authored-By at all you could just match on that and say something like "invalid co-authored-by trailer detected (remember, no LLM commits or commit messages at present)." -- Sean Whitton