Re: LLM Commit in upstream `master`?!

Eli Zaretskii [26/Jul  2:09pm +03] wrote:
> Isn't that a lost battle?  Nothing is ever lost on the Internet; in
> particular, sites like the Way Back Machine will have picked up that
> instance already, as well as whatever Git mirrors are there in the
> wild which sync with us.  I don't think a forced push can give us what
> you'd like to have, not after more than a day this was in the wild.

I don't think so -- it's not that the commit mustn't exist anywhere at
all, but rather than it shouldn't be part of what we declare to be the
official history.

-- 
Sean Whitton