Re: LLM Commit in upstream `master`?!

Sean Whitton <[email protected]> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii [26/Jul  2:09pm +03] wrote:
>> Isn't that a lost battle?  Nothing is ever lost on the Internet; in
>> particular, sites like the Way Back Machine will have picked up that
>> instance already, as well as whatever Git mirrors are there in the
>> wild which sync with us.  I don't think a forced push can give us what
>> you'd like to have, not after more than a day this was in the wild.
>
> I don't think so -- it's not that the commit mustn't exist anywhere at
> all, but rather than it shouldn't be part of what we declare to be the
> official history.

FTR: please don't force-push or otherwise rewrite Git history.
That would be disruptive for me (and for others too, I imagine).


Thanks,

Eshel