Re: LLM Commit in upstream `master`?!

* Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> :
Wrote on Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:59:45 -0400:
> I know Emacs maintainers are not crazy at all, so I'll file the whole
> event under "blunders", but I have to speak up and say this was a very
> bad decision.  I don't use LLMs and keep praying that all the AI data
> centers burn up in flames, but can we stop about this LLM paranoia?
> LLMs cause enough real immediate problems that we don't need any
> extra paranoia.
>
> Yuan made a mistake because he misunderstood the policy, we learn, we
> `git revert`, and we move on.  Force pushes are not for mere worries.

UDP (useless data point)
I happened to do a pull on master yesterday before i saw sean's post
here. I'm glad I don't have the commit in the history (which I'm
hosting on my local disk), and I'm glad I'm not forced to keep that
commit on my disk because of some bureaucracy.