Re: LLM Commit in upstream `master`?!

"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> writes:

> I do not consider it a "very minor" issue, but both a huge risk of
> copyright litigation (I expect that there are many lawyers who would go
> after Emacs at the first chance) and of losing trust (not just here:
> there are many outlets who go against GNU when there’s any opening).

FYI, the current GNU policy to not accept LLM contributions did not
demand removing existing LLM contributions that were accepted before
the announcement (it was explicitly stated). So, it is not as huge of a
risk as you are describing.

To be clear, I personally do not see a single instance of force push as
a huge deal either, but please do not exaggerate the problem with LLM
contributions.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode maintainer,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>