Fixing security vulnerabilities before new releases (was: Emacs 31 release-blocking bugs)
Eshel Yaron <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:25:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> writes: > Eshel Yaron [29/Jul 1:16pm +02] wrote: >> Sean Whitton <[email protected]> writes: >>> Eshel Yaron [28/Jul 6:52pm +02] wrote: >>>> >>>> Please consider waiting for some mitigation for the vulnerability Stefan >>>> described in bug#80574. >>>> It's a serious security concern, better fix it before the release. >>> >>> That bug is present in Emacs 30, so 31.1 release does not need to wait >>> on it. As soon as we have a fix we are happy with we will do another >>> point release. >> >> Hmm... There's an arbitrary code execution vulnerability that makes >> opening files with Emacs unsafe. Indeed, it affects existing Emacs >> versions as well---that's a good reason to mitigate it ASAP and maybe >> provide a security fix for Emacs 30, but it wouldn't make sense to >> release another vulnerable version. >> ISTM that if anything is a release-blocker, this is it. > > I don't understand your reasoning at all here. We do not make the > situation worse by releasing Emacs 31. Therefore the issues are not > interdependent. OK, let me try to clarify it further: Releasing a new version invites more users to install and use it, and encouraging users to run vulnerable software is at best a disservice. True, it wouldn't make things worse for users who are already running a vulnerable version, but I don't think that's the right bar to aim for. Instead, we should make sure we make things better for them, by providing a version that mitigates this issue ASAP. AFAICT, releasing a vulnerable Emacs 31.1 would delay that mitigation unnecessarily. To be clear, I think a mitigation can be rather simple/straightforward, and it doesn't have to be the permanent solution. I'd recommend releasing Emacs 31 with a "bandaid" solution (I can suggest something if you agree), and fixing it properly in a later release. Thanks, Eshel P.S. my 'trust-manager' package provides a rough mitigation for this vulnerability that protects users in existing Emacs versions. I'd really like to disable this mitigation when the package is used in Emacs 31. :)