Re: SDL terminal type

Understood, thank you both for the clarification.

I will respect the project's position and will not post further patches or code from this work to the list while the FSF guidelines on machine-assisted contributions are being worked out.

To be clear about intent: emacs-gpu will simply continue as an independent GPL fork, with no expectation of inclusion in GNU Emacs (the README already states this). If specific guidelines are published at some point, I will be happy to reevaluate whether an upstream contribution is possible under them.

Thanks for taking the question seriously; I understand it is not an easy one.

Richard Stallman <[email protected]> writes:

> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   > > It's not about any general concerns, it's specifically about the GNU
>   > > project's current policy.  In the absence of more specific guidelines,
>   > > we have to assume that the editing you did isn't enough to make it not
>   > > LLM-generated.  So please avoid posting such things as Eli says.
>
> It is not clear whether subsequent editing by a human -- any amount of
> it -- would overcome the copyright uncertainty caused by using the
> machine-generated contribution.  Whether that is the right way to think
> about the question is not clear either.  That is part of what FSF people
> are consulting lawyers about.

--

Andros Fenollosa

https://andros.dev/