Re: LLM Commit in upstream `master`?!

> I don't think that is going to happen, though, because generally the
> problem is the code, not only the commit message.  In the case that we
> aren't going to re-introduce the code right after, we can just revert
> the whole commit and I agree that's good enough.

There is no need to remove LLM generated code from our history: the FSF
explicitly said that.  They're just asking as a matter of precaution to
reject contributions that use LLMs.  If a bit of slop gets through here
and there by accident, it's not ideal, but it's not the end of the
world, so it wouldn't deserve a force-push.


=== Stefan