Re: master e4df903f6b5 2/2: ; Fix last change

>> I think it could be be cleaner, and help discourage uncontrolled uses
>> of cl-letf, to define a macro that would be used like this:
>>
>> (testing-force-value (yes-or-no-p t)
>>   ...tests...)
>>
>> The name of this macro, and other features useful for tests, could
>> avoid suggesting using this in other clever ways that are not wise design.
>
> I like this idea. We could add the following macro to ERT:

Related package: `el-mock`.


=== Stefan