Re: AGENTS.md
Yuri Khan <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Aug 2026 22:31:37 +0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP_d_8W+h5-PQuZ=NwL_OtZqs8kSp9TLv9-MM6eB+E8M7QrpEg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 9:21 PM Stéphane Marks <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think you can define a harness in terms of the agency it helps to orchestrate. Perhaps combine the agent and harness definitions if that's how you think it is most useful. I actually believe separate terms are most useful. The two variables — model and harness — are orthogonal, and adjusting one or the other helps one achieve different goals. > The concept of "project" also must consider that many people use these things not for writing code but exploring and developing mathematical models, reviewing electrical schematics and product data sheets, building presentations, writing documents, etc. Yes. Emacs’s notion of project is actually quite similar — a project is what you work on.