Re: Discussion about why GNU/Linux system upgrades cause old programs to break
Richard Stallman <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Aug 2026 23:49:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > An upgrade can most certainly do that: if A version 1 requires B and C, > and A version 2 requires merely B, the upgrade and and subsequent > cleanup will remove C. > This is only avoided if C was also marked as wanted (or "manually" > installed, or added to @world, ... depending on package manager). I understand what an upgrade is -- but what exactly is a "subsequent cleanup"? Does it mean sysadmins, after the upgrade, think about which old libraries to delete? Or is it something automatic that happens as part of an upgrade? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)