Re: [GNU ELPA] New package: flymake-harper

João Távora <[email protected]> writes:

> Then again, your claim of "halving the line count" is probably a bit
> exagerated.

I've attached my version of your flymake-straightforward.el, so there's
no need to guess, you can just check.

>>> The pain is finding out [which] of the million possible protocols
>>> gives you the right convenience-to-flexibility ratio.

>> Sure, it's not a trivial task.  I just saying it's worth the effort,
>> since these fixes often make diagnostics much more useful.
>
> It's not trivial indeed (else it would have been made, probably) and the
> most worrysome part is that you don't seem to have understood it doesn't
> start in Flymake at all.

Nah, I've understood that claim of yours pretty well I think.
(Indeed, in my implementation, Flymake fixes build on top of an
infrastructure provided by a generic refactor.el library.  I think I've
already mentioned that too at some point.)
I don't really care where "it starts" though; I hope to see the feature
I requested implemented, however you (or whoever maintains Flymake
nowadays) see fit.


Thanks,

Eshel