Re: [GNU ELPA] New package: flymake-harper
Philip Kaludercic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
João Távora <[email protected]> writes: > Juri Linkov <[email protected]> writes: > >>>> 'harper-ls' has a code action for quick fixes that >>>> suggests fixes for the selected error. But integration >>>> with eglot is more uncertain. >>> >>> What do you mean? Have you ever tried this particular one? >> >> I meant trying to implement the same UI as flyspell-mode >> for spell-checking by harper. > > Oh. I haven't used Flyspell in ages. Not sure it should be a reference > these days. IMO it ought to remain the default recommendation. In my experience LSP is often more flaky (or at least there is a great variance when it comes to quality) and at least currently are not as easy to install as aspell, hunspell, enchant, etc. My using flymake to integrate something like Harper is only done begrudgingly, since as this thread points out the interface is suboptimal, but I still find it more comfortable than to integrate LSP -- despite that being the intended usage of Harper.