Re: [GNU ELPA] New package: flymake-harper

On Thu, Aug 20, 2026, 19:13 Philip Kaludercic <[email protected]> wrote:

> João Távora <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Juri Linkov <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >>>> 'harper-ls' has a code action for quick fixes that
> >>>> suggests fixes for the selected error.  But integration
> >>>> with eglot is more uncertain.
> >>>
> >>> What do you mean?  Have you ever tried this particular one?
> >>
> >> I meant trying to implement the same UI as flyspell-mode
> >> for spell-checking by harper.
> >
> > Oh.  I haven't used Flyspell in ages.  Not sure it should be a reference
> > these days.
>
> IMO it ought to remain the default recommendation.  In my experience LSP
> is often more flaky (or at least there is a great variance when it comes
> to quality) and at least currently are not as easy to install as aspell,
> hunspell, enchant, etc.  My using flymake to integrate something like
> Harper is only done begrudgingly, since as this thread points out the
> interface is suboptimal, but I still find it more comfortable than to
> integrate LSP -- despite that being the intended usage of Harper.
>

What's uncomfortable about harper-ls or LSP in general?

>