Re: Operation "Careful Emacs"
Richard Stallman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] Decision-making about installing packages has a tendency to be rushed rather than careful. Important questions may go unasked, or their answers may zip past with little scrutiny. We need to improve the quality of these decisions, not the speed. To do this, I am thinking of introducing some formal steps into the process of evaluating a package. We need to send the list of usual questions, and probe until they have all been answered with full answers. After that, we should schedule a week or two weeks for discussion of that package. With no decision until that period has finished. Instead of using emacs-devel, we should have a separate list specifically for these discussions. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)