Re: master d423017cae1: * lisp/vc/vc-dir.el (vc-dir-headers): Try a hints separator line.

> From: Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:19:34 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii [28/Aug  9:03am +03] wrote:
> > I apologize for not catching this discussion in time, but IMO this
> > change is more backward-incompatible than it should be.  It's okay to
> > add strike-through on terminals which support that, but why break
> > those which don't and only have underline?  The argument that
> > strike-through "seems about as common as underline" is the proverbial
> > famous last words; we don't really need to have even a slightest risk
> > here, because "we have the technology" to support both cases.
> >
> > So please let's fix the defface so that it uses strike-through when
> > supported, otherwise uses underline, and let's augment the change in
> > make-separator-line so that it also supports terminals without support
> > for strike-through but which support underline.  Okay?
> 
> Yes, sure, let's support both.  I think like this?

Yes, LGTM.  Thanks.