Re: master d423017cae1: * lisp/vc/vc-dir.el (vc-dir-headers): Try a hints separator line.

> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:45:15 +0300
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
> From: Dmitry Gutov <[email protected]>
> 
> On 28/08/2026 09:03, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > It's okay to
> > add strike-through on terminals which support that, but why break
> > those which don't and only have underline?
> 
> Fair argument, but do you know terminals that support underline but not 
> both, in any recent use?

Why do we need to know them?  Are you 110% sure there are no such
terminals out there?  I'm saying let's not run the risk, however
small, when the way to avoid it is so simple.

> Additionally - but that might just be my impression - the line-of-dashes 
> fallback we use when the feature is not available might be better than 
> the underline based solution. Because it's spaced evenly on both sides 
> of the line.

Since we've been using underline for quite some time, keeping that as
a fallback cannot cause any new problems, can it?