Re: Operation "Fat Emacs"
Philip Kaludercic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> writes: > Philip Kaludercic [28/Aug 4:00pm GMT] wrote: >> Sean Whitton <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Ernesto CENUSA [28/Aug 3:29pm +02] wrote: >>>> And as you said, the two could still share some of the same technical >>>> groundwork. So I was wondering where things stand on that side for >>>> “Fat Emacs”, and whether there is anything a newcomer could usefully >>>> do to help. >>> >>> Thanks for your interest. I don't think we want to commit resources to >>> this at the time being, and as a newcomer you'd need a lot of guidance. >> >> Actually, I think that adding Version and Package-Requires headers to >> files around emacs.git is a very newcomer friendly task, isn't it not? > > Is that really something we want? I don't see any harm in making the dependencies between modules explicit. Then again, since these are all inside of Emacs we could probably automate it by analyzing all function calls when we want to add a package to ELPA.