Fw: Is anybody using EFS?
"Andy Norman" <[email protected]> Wed, 12 May 2004 00:10:16 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.efs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <010501c437ad$1f96c160$d11f900f@gyre> |
Sent to the -request address in error perhaps. ----- Original Message ----- From: "O'Callaghan, Timothy (ELS)" <T.OCallaghan-dUsxN/C1/n1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> To: "'Martin Maechler'" <maechler-J/1JLT8/[email protected]> Cc: "Efs-Help-Request (E-mail)" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 4:22 PM Subject: RE: Is anybody using EFS? > > > > > >>>>> "O'Callaghan" == O'Callaghan, Timothy (ELS) > > <T.OCallaghan-dUsxN/C1/n1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> > > >>>>> on Tue, 11 May 2004 15:07:13 +0100 writes: > > > > O'Callaghan> Hi, I just want to know if anyone is currently > > O'Callaghan> using EFS? > > > > as I just found, not any more. > > > > I thought it was quiet in here. > > > You did ask recently about VMS, right? > > > > Yep, and followed up with this one due to the lack of response. > > > I haven't used it for that either during the last several > > months, but for me this was one main reason to start using EFS > > instead of "plain ange-ftp" : I was able to "dired" to a > > remote-VMS machine and edit files there seemlessly. > > > > Well now VMS support seems to be horribly mangled, if not broken. > At least for me, on the two OpenVMS Alpha boxes i have tried it on. > I was going to try and figure out what emaxers were using instead of > EFS, i didn't think there was an alternative? > > Tim. >