RE: Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace

> Your suggestion was to use the shorter 'cl-' prefix instead,
> and at least I think that is a good compromise.  So instead of
> using 'eieio-class-name', for instance, we'd rather use
> 'cl-class-name'.

So does this mean that we can no longer know from the `cl-' prefix which library
is involved?

(I don't mean which file in the library, but which library.  In the past, `cl-'
pretty much indicated library `cl' - either file cl.el or one of its related
files cl-mac.el, cl-seq.el etc.)

(I have not been following the thread.  Just happened to notice this part, which
made me wonder.)