Re: Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace
David Engster <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Feb 2013 22:28:17 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.eieio |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stefan Monnier writes: >> In toplevel form: >> eieio.el:168:1:Error: Symbol's function definition is void: eieio--class-parent > > Can you (setq byte-compile-error t debug-on-error t) so as to get > a backtrace? Did you mean `byte-compile-error-on-warn'? Anyway, I'm afraid I just don't get a backtrace with debug-on-error. >> I also cannot find a definition for eieio--class-parent, but maybe it's >> hidden somewhere? > > It's defined (as a macro) by the call to (eieio--define-field-accessors > class ...) which is kind of a "mini cl-defstruct". I see. Now, I can compile your patched EIEIO with trunk, but using the latest pretest gives me the above error. I can fix this by including the define-field-accessor macro and its following two calls (for class and object) in the 'eval-and-compile' clause. Not sure if that's the right thing to do, though. Something must have changed in trunk in how this is handled? -David