Re: How about a roadmap?

J.P. wrote:

> Here's what I'm thinking for June and the latter half of
> 2022. Some Q3+ items won't make sense without additional
> context, which I'm happy to provide. But it's also fine to
> just regard them as opaque placeholders in what's really
> just a sketch to block out the basic shape of things to
> come. The Q4+ stuff is still wide open, so feel free to take
> a chainsaw to it if need be. As usual, leading numbers
> approximate the relative cost of closing an item.

How do you make the gods laugh ... ?

But whatever makes sense to you ...

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal