Re: bug#58985: 29.0.50; Have auth-source-pass behave more like other back ends

"J.P." <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Michael,

Hi,

>> +(defcustom auth-source-pass-standard-search nil
>> +  "Whether to use more standardized search behavior.
>> +When nil, the password-store backend works like it always has and
>> +considers at most one `:user' search parameter and returns at
>> +most one result.  With t, it tries to more faithfully mimic other
>> +auth-source backends."
>> +  :version "29.1"
>> +  :type 'boolean)
>>
>> - The name of this user option as well as its docstring are focussed on
>>   the current behavior. People won't know what "mimic other auth-source
>>   backends" would mean. Please describe the effect w/o that comparison,
>>   and pls give it a name based on its effect, and not "...-standard-search".
>
> I've changed the name to `auth-source-pass-extra-query-keywords' and
> updated the description to something hopefully more adequate.
>
>> - I'm missing the documentation in doc/misc/auth.texi and etc/NEWS.
>
> Added.

Thanks.

> BTW, I was initially thinking it'd be better to wait for a more
> comprehensive and maintainable solution, like something based around a
> larger set of common functions to be shared among the various back ends
> (hence the [POC] qualifier on my patches). However, I suppose such a
> thing could be done later, once the desired behavior is all dialed in
> (perhaps alongside addressing support for full CRUD operations, which
> are still missing, AFIAK). Anyway, I really don't know enough about pass
> or auth-source to commit to such an endeavor. But I've reached out to
> some folks who may be able to lend a hand.

Such a change would be desirable. However, Ted, the author of
auth-source.el, isn't active these days. Personally I feel responsible
for the secrets backend, and I try bug fixing in the other auth-source
parts. That's all.

According to admin/MAINTAINERS, nobody else feels responsible for
auth-source. So I doubt that such a change will happen soon.

From my pov you could push the changes. But as you said the other
message, you'll wait for feeback fron users. That's OK, but pls take
into account that later this month an emacs-29 branch will be cut
off. Feature changes shall be pushed until then.

> Thanks,
> J.P.

Best regards, Michael.