Re: bug#58985: 29.0.50; Have auth-source-pass behave more like other back ends
Akib Azmain Turja <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.erc.general,gmane.emacs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Akib Azmain Turja via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <[email protected]> writes: > "J.P." <[email protected]> writes: > >> While I certainly welcome the assiduous scrutinizing of Emacs lisp >> mechanics and technique (truly), I was mainly hoping that, as an avid >> pass user, you would also help flesh out the precise effects of the >> behavior introduced by these changes and hopefully share some insights >> into how they might impact day-to-day usage for the typical pass user. >> Granted, that necessarily involves applying these patches atop your >> daily driver and living with them for a spell and, ideally, investing >> some thought into imagining common usage patterns beyond your own (plus >> any potentially problematic edge cases). If you have the energy to >> devote to (perhaps just some of) these areas, it would really help move >> this bug report forward. Thanks. > > Actually, I'm not very brave, and any damage to my password-store would > be an absolute disaster. > > However, I have made a backup and add the encrypted passwords to a Git > repository, and since the patch looks safe, I'm going to apply and test > it. I have applied the patch the on top commit f8c11b5a, and it works fine. I did some basic testing (manually) of auth-source-pass and the dependent packages I use, password-store and pass, and they all seem to be unaffected when the new option enabled. So I guess we can enable it by default. I didn't felt the need of test with the new feature disabled, since the patch doesn't touch any old code. And I also found that, auth-source finds the entry "[email protected]" correctly with (auth-source-search :host "disroot.org") when the new user option is set to t. However, I haven't still installed the Emacs build with the patch applied as my daily driver, I'm working on that. The tests were performed on Emacs build without GUI. -- Akib Azmain Turja, GPG key: 70018CE5819F17A3BBA666AFE74F0EFA922AE7F5 Fediverse: [email protected] Codeberg: akib emailselfdefense.fsf.org | "Nothing can be secure without encryption."
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEyVTKmrtL6kNBe3FRVTX89U2IYWsFAmNwnBsACgkQVTX89U2I YWtoyg/9Fja6JkoI2zBrRdG9b0sR+KS64oTIlA8apRkaDiGnjjXFXZa3D7dyf0/y YGzq+fIZAHSfUlcR/k/9R4X8I0n83nYXdDUwFp+TR4rj/XFLjZXNrhkclzm/ZyAB HiFwZRfDeCVzsiUOWMlasOEIgTqUYl4jXxWfGMYS59928WA4HKqOhhXORzOhroOy Yq9y/xjYD8gfrNLLmCOQv+emIKRKlvYC76uwo07k6GQECaQfDg+TDo2FDi/7zyga g3QrywLl+tdzbonxQGnSbpNE6er5u1wPiKgbkNGDUgLFnM30aCmnCDjnTNhgWGFB 9ys47j07v3PAwGyMt0w0ea5f9K3PMqqETWeVVdq6LtdgPPMmEVkXhPCmjaUvBqc9 Mmay2rk9kvZdGwx2cQiNi8xFbseAeeaE5KFkpAJ/Km5/si6Rp/qtmeAFEN0+BaK3 ay7Y2GPB2BZoP8xO41t7dqQa9ElUg5d9h9OIo1DOU5Bl6UfXv3EPdTXAZKBRJmYv N7NFS25H9cyfLegjWyq9c8U/j9dV2M8M9pIVgYdSYIAg+0ceOjnNi4em306Ux7wU tDdjm4mcXjhcm70pjFhqYmCPpEIKzl4Ge3FzC8/d9FZIuDS5GERXCB/eXiouSbVj Deh08noi0jeLs3EQZzfvyRGgzlxdVqJg0+HZ3Z4rURExY+xaMrc= =+DUp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----