Re: bug#29108: 25.3; ERC SASL support

Amin Bandali <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.erc.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hey J.P., (all,)

J.P. writes:

> v14. Revised docs a bit and renamed some compat functions. Added a 900
> handler to erc-backend. Added secrets-wrapping for auth-source-pass
> results in erc-compat. Ditched hook indirection for AUTHENTICATE
> handler.
>

Thanks!  I've pushed all of these patches.  All but one of them
were committed without any additional changes; and that one was
0006-Add-non-IRCv3-SASL-module-to-ERC.patch, where I just added
the missing entries for doc/misc/erc.texi and etc/ERC-NEWS to the
commit message.

> Subject: [PATCH 4/8] Support local ERC modules in erc-mode buffers
[...]
> diff --git a/doc/misc/erc.texi b/doc/misc/erc.texi
> index 0d807e323e..b9c6e33d36 100644
> --- a/doc/misc/erc.texi
> +++ b/doc/misc/erc.texi
> @@ -390,8 +390,11 @@ Modules
>  
>  There is a spiffy customize interface, which may be reached by typing
>  @kbd{M-x customize-option @key{RET} erc-modules @key{RET}}.
> -Alternatively, set @code{erc-modules} manually and then call
> -@code{erc-update-modules}.
> +When removing a module outside of the Custom ecosystem, you may wish
> +to ensure it's disabled by invoking its associated minor-mode toggle,
> +such as @kbd{M-x erc-spelling-mode @key{RET}}.  Note that, these days,
> +calling @code{erc-update-modules} in an init file is typically
> +unnecessary.

What do you think about tweaking the last sentence to be more specific
about when calling `erc-update-modules' may still be needed, maybe
with a short example, please?

> Subject: [PATCH 6/8] Add non-IRCv3 SASL module to ERC
[...]
> diff --git a/doc/misc/erc.texi b/doc/misc/erc.texi
[...]

What do you think about adding a few short examples to the manual
showing the usage of each of the variants/mechanisms with a call to
`erc-tls'?  Kind of like the ones in "Connecting to an IRC Server"
that show how to use `:client-certificate' for instance.

Many thanks for all of your work on implementing and landing SASL
support for ERC, a feature that many ERC users (myself included)
have wished for and looked forward to seeing in ERC for years!

-amin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.