Re: bug#60936: 30.0.50; ERC >5.5: Add erc-fill style based on visual-line-mode

"J.P." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.erc.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michael Albinus <[email protected]> writes:

> "J.P." <[email protected]> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
>> There have been three failures (all on native-comp-speed2-master) over
>> the last three weeks pointing to these tests, which haven't changed in
>> the year-plus they've existed in tree.  No test appears in multiple
>> failures, and all continue to pass daily on commercial GitLab (GCP)
>> runners using the same EMBA container image.  They also pass locally
>> with "make check" and "make -j -C test SELECTOR=t check-lisp-erc".  If
>> these tweaks don't fix the problem, they can be branded :unstable.
>
> If the problem happens only on emba, you can skip the tests with
>
>   :tags (if (getenv "EMACS_EMBA_CI")
>             '(:expensive-test :unstable)
>           '(:expensive-test))
>
> Best regards, Michael.

Thanks Michael. I guess checking for

  (equal (get-env "CI_JOB_STAGE") "native-comp")

might also help unless that's inadvisable for some reason (though I'm
still hoping it doesn't come to this). And not that you should care, but
I've been waiting for

  bug#65176: ~25 test failures from make check in the latest master

to wrap up before installing this or similar.

BTW, does EMBA expose any public /metrics endpoints? I ask because
perhaps investigating possible relationships between intermittent
EMBA-only job failures and something like node-exporter signals [1]
might prove fruitful. Just a thought.

[1] https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/administration/monitoring/prometheus/index.html#prometheus-as-a-grafana-data-source
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.