Re: bug#68660: 29.2; ELPA: Wrong type argument w. multiple maintainers in package-menu-mode
Philip Kaludercic <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:59:19 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.erc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"J.P." <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Philip, > > "J.P." <[email protected]> writes: > >>>> Please let me know if anything is required from ERC to make this a >>>> reality. And, of course, I very much appreciate your taking the time. >>> >>> Nothing specific on ERC's side, no. >>> But patches for `elpa-admin.el` and for Emacs would be welcome >>> (tho extra time would be welcome as well :-) >> >> As far as patches go, I unfortunately remain rather uninitiated to the >> mysteries of this package system and doubt I can up my game >> sufficiently >> enough to amount to anything more than a sad annoyance. However, I can >> try harassing other package.el folk to see if any among them might >> bend. >> Thanks. > > You seem to be among the more active Emacs contributors in and around > package.el and GNU ELPA, so I suppose I'm asking if you wouldn't mind > weighing in on this when you get a chance. > > To summarize, I've belatedly discovered that once ERC 5.6 is released, > the more-or-less widely acknowledged [1] "baseline" package-upgrade > method (of manually navigating the `package-menu-mode' UI from M-x > list-packages) won't actually work on any ERC-supported Emacs release > (currently 27+) even though it's the one method recommended in ERC's > docs (expressly because it was perceived as being fail-safe). And while > C-u M-x package-install RET does in fact work on Emacs 29, it's sadly > not documented in the ERC manual that ships with 29.2. > > Stefan has suggested renaming the `:maintainer' item in the `extras' > slot of `package-desc' objects to `:maintainers' (plural). IIUC, this > would have the effect of solving the issue by omitting the "Maintainer:" > line item in *Help* buffers produced by `package-menu-describe-package' > and friends for all packages on all Emacs versions below 30.1. That also seems to be the best idea to me as well. > Full > remediation would, I think, also require that foo-pkg.el files and > /archive-contents data hosted on elpa.gnu.org reflect the newer format. I am not familiar with ERC's infrastructure, shouldn't this happen automatically? > To help move this process along, Stefan has called for patches, but I > unfortunately am unable to reciprocate because I lack the wherewithal. > Hoping you're able to assist in this regard either directly, with code, > or by pointing out specific areas in the Emacs code base (and possibly > elpa-admin's as well) that would need addressing. I could help, but I don't understand what is going on well enough to produce any concrete patches. > TIA, > J.P. > > [1] > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2024-01/msg01575.html