Re: bug#69860: 29.2; ERC 5.6-git: erc: Incorrect face formatting applied for fg=99 bg=x (irccontrols module with erc-interpret-mirc-color=t)
"J.P." <[email protected]> Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:16:16 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.erc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alcor via General discussion about ERC <[email protected]> writes: > On Emacs 29.2, using erc-5.6snapshot0.20240310.61129: > > 1. Enable the irccontrols module (for erc) > 2. Enable `erc-interpret-mirc-color' > 3. Login onto any IRC network, any channel, or perform a /query session > 4. Either send, or have someone send you the string ^C99,4Text with a > red background^C (Key sequence: C-q C-c 99,4Text with a red background > C-q C-c) > > According to https://modern.ircdocs.horse/formatting.html the text > *should* get formatted with a default foreground, and a red background. The > observed behavior - however - is that the text is formatted with multiple > background "bg" faces: (erc-control-default-bg bg:erc-color-face4 > erc-input-face). > > A screenshot illustrating the issue is attached to this message. Oof. Looks like `erc-get-fg-color-face' sets `erc-control-default-bg' in its catch-all `cond' case. As you say, this produces: #("THIS TEXT IS FORMATTED" 0 22 (font-lock-face (erc-control-default-bg bg:erc-color-face4))) And `erc-get-bg-color-face' sets `erc-control-default-fg'. Clearly, whoever's responsible for this outrage should be banished. (Thanks.)