Re: bug#73812: 30.0.91; ERC 5.6.0.30.1: Customizing erc-modules loads ERC when starting Emacs
"J.P." <[email protected]> Sat, 02 Nov 2024 08:40:54 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.erc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: >> From: "J.P." <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> >> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 17:49:43 -0700 >> >> Dear auxiliary maintainers, >> >> It seems Eli has tired of my nagging or is otherwise indisposed when it >> comes to this issue. > > I have not. But you made the mistake of quoting only a little bit > from the previous message, from which I couldn't even understand those > were my words. And I generally avoid commenting on changes related to > ERC because I don't use it and am not familiar with its code. > > In the future, if it's my/our decision that you are seeking, please > quote more of the context and ask for our response explicitly, to > avoid these misunderstandings. Makes sense. My apologies. > >> > Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: >> > >> >>> All in all, I'd prefer to leave this alone in Emacs 30. We have time >> >>> to try reverting this on master and seeing whether it's a net win or a >> >>> net loss, given the past history of the issue. (AFAIU, if you remove >> >>> this line, some change is pertinent in the manual?) >> > >> > It's been reverted on master for ten days now with no complaints: >> > >> > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=1854f275 >> > >> > If that's long enough to qualify as a net win, can we proceed with a >> > backport? >> >> It's been two weeks now since I was tasked with reverting this on master >> in order to assess the damage, of which none has since been reported. >> >> Apologies if I'm out of line in pressing the issue, but I'm driven by a >> need to advocate for ERC's users, who've suffered greatly in the past >> due to my cowardliness in similar situations [1]. As such, I would very >> much appreciate a final verdict on this matter. > > I'd prefer to wait a little longer for any fallout of reverting this > on master. IME, two weeks is not long enough, as many people take > several weeks to update their builds. Emacs 30 is not going to be > released tomorrow, so we still have time. > > Let's talk about this in two more weeks, ok? Sounds good. Thanks.