Re: Advice on setting up ESS to edit and knit Rmarkdown files

Martin Maechler via ESS-help <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.ess.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> Lionel Henry via ESS-help 
>>>>>     on Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:15:42 +0200 writes:

    > We'd love to do a release but ESS is not in a good place
    > right now.  

Definitely.  The reason is that there have been too many bugs
introduced with the new features, so we could/should not
release.

This has been the real reason for not releasing formally.

In addition, another important goal for the release has been to
create an ESS+ "package" (not mainly an ELPA package, but also a
traditional  tarball / zip file) which will contain
ESS plus relevant parts of polymode even though the latter is
only maintained by one of us; the use of both *and* correct
interplay between polymode and ESS is really crucial for parts
modern R using ESS, notably as we had decided to declare the ess
noweb-mode (for editing *.Rnw, i.e., Sweave & (tex-based) knitr)
as obsolete. 

    > Recent versions of Emacs interrupt background
    > commands (essential to completion and contextual help like
    > eldoc) when the user starts typing, which causes hard to
    > solve problems.

    > The dev branch is mostly working but not 100%
    > correctly. Unfortunately none of us seem to have the time
    > to work on ESS at the moment.

    > That said, while Martin, Vitalie and I notice issues here
    > and there, we haven't had serious bug reports in a while,
    > despite the dev branch being used by many Melpa users. So
    > maybe releasing in the current state is better than  nothing.

Well...
It would be the first ESS release with serious (for some / in
some use case situaitons) known bugs ..

    > Best, Lionel


    > On 9/22/21, Dirk Eddelbuettel via ESS-help
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> 
    >> On 20 September 2021 at 13:59, Sparapani, Rodney via
    >> ESS-help wrote: | Generally, this stuff should just work
    >> out-of-the-box.
    >> 
    >> Understood.
    >> 
    >> | And we are not a company like RStudio so this FOSS
    >> setup works for us as | developers and hopefully it still
    >> serves the users well.
    >> 
    >> But legal structure has nothing to with 'calling a
    >> release'. Which is done by authors (who should know the
    >> code better than users) saying "yep what we have at HEAD
    >> right now is good" and then cut a tarball.  That is a
    >> _marker_.  Which some less-informed people like me can
    >> take (and then ship downstream to Debian, and with that
    >> Ubuntu etc).
    >> 
    >> Without a marker, no shipment. Less ideal to me and
    >> others.
    >> 
    >> So pretty-please if someone would: could a release one of
    >> these moons. It does not have to be frequent or regularly
    >> schedule or anything.  But maybe more often than once
    >> every few years?  Maybe when you sync with upstream Emacs
    >> (assuming you do now)?
    >> 
    >> Dirk
    >> 
    >> --
    >> https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel |
    >> [email protected]
    >> 
    >> ______________________________________________
    >> [email protected] mailing list
    >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-help
    >> 

    > ______________________________________________
    > [email protected] mailing list
    > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-help

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-help
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.