Re: ESS confused about newest R
Enrico Schumann via ESS-help <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.ess.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, Kevin R. Coombes via ESS-help writes: > Hi, > > I have been using emacs with ESS for years. By now,I > probably have old versions of each installed - so I > know one answer to my question is probably "install the > newest versions". But I don't really want to do that > right now. (Especially since the web support page for > ESS still claims that my ancient version is the most > recent official release.) > > Ever since I installed R 4.2.0 (and now having just > installed R-4.2.1), ESS insists that R-4.1.0 is the > newest version on my system. It creates separate > commands to run R-4.2.0-64bit and R-4.2.1-64bit, but is > unable to tell that these are newer than R-4.1.0, so > the default "M-x R" is the same as "M-x R-newest", > which starts the wrong version > > The only thing that I see that has changed is that all > earlier versions of R also include 32-bit versions. I > don't see why that should matter, since I have *not* > changed the default value (t) of > ess-prefer-higher-bit. Obviously, I am missing > something, since I can't figure out how to convince ESS > to take the R-4.2 versions into consideration when > determining the newest version. > > Has anyone eslse seen this? Does anyone know if there > are minor edits I can make to ess-r-mode-el that will > persuade my old versions of emacs and ESS to just do > the right thing? > > Thanks, > Kevin > I have only seen something like this on Windows, where I explicitly set `inferior-ess-r-program` (which I think was called `inferior-R-program-name` in older versions of ESS) to the right executable. -- Enrico Schumann Lucerne, Switzerland http://enricoschumann.net ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-help