[gnus git] branch master updated: n0-17-89-ge9ec767 =1= New command `gnus-summary-reply-to-list-with-original'.

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.gnus.cvs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
       via  e9ec7671168ff4f308feb00f08683042639c47df (commit)
      from  eb5df6520fbe0f3bf634382f8eb749a6f23a1437 (commit)


- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit e9ec7671168ff4f308feb00f08683042639c47df
Author: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun Jun 26 12:03:35 2011 +0200

    New command `gnus-summary-reply-to-list-with-original'.

diff --git a/lisp/ChangeLog b/lisp/ChangeLog
index 4c58790..0e4fca9 100644
--- a/lisp/ChangeLog
+++ b/lisp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2011-06-26  Timo Juhani Lindfors <[email protected]>  (tiny change)
+
+	* gnus-msg.el (gnus-summary-reply-to-list-with-original): New command
+	and keystroke.
+
 2011-06-23  Katsumi Yamaoka  <[email protected]>
 
 	* auth-source.el (auth-source-netrc-cache): Move forward.
diff --git a/lisp/gnus-msg.el b/lisp/gnus-msg.el
index 093eec3..e256446 100644
--- a/lisp/gnus-msg.el
+++ b/lisp/gnus-msg.el
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ Thank you for your help in stamping out bugs.
   "r" gnus-summary-reply
   "y" gnus-summary-yank-message
   "R" gnus-summary-reply-with-original
+  "L" gnus-summary-reply-to-list-with-original
   "w" gnus-summary-wide-reply
   "W" gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
   "v" gnus-summary-very-wide-reply
@@ -1154,6 +1155,16 @@ The original article will be yanked."
   (interactive "P")
   (gnus-summary-reply (gnus-summary-work-articles n) wide))
 
+(defun gnus-summary-reply-to-list-with-original (n &optional wide)
+  "Start composing a reply mail to the current message.
+The reply goes only to the mailing list.
+The original article will be yanked."
+  (interactive "P")
+  (let ((message-reply-to-function
+	 (lambda nil
+	   `((To . ,(gnus-mailing-list-followup-to))))))
+    (gnus-summary-reply (gnus-summary-work-articles n) wide)))
+
 (defun gnus-summary-reply-broken-reply-to (&optional yank wide very-wide)
   "Like `gnus-summary-reply' except removing reply-to field.
 If prefix argument YANK is non-nil, the original article is yanked
diff --git a/texi/ChangeLog b/texi/ChangeLog
index 2b31a56..295dcd4 100644
--- a/texi/ChangeLog
+++ b/texi/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2011-06-26  Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen  <[email protected]>
+
+	* gnus.texi (Summary Mail Commands): Document
+	`gnus-summary-reply-to-list-with-original'.
+
 2011-05-31  Teodor Zlatanov  <[email protected]>
 
 	* gnus.texi (Store custom flags and keywords): Refer to
diff --git a/texi/gnus.texi b/texi/gnus.texi
index a61b5b1..8350be7 100644
--- a/texi/gnus.texi
+++ b/texi/gnus.texi
@@ -5568,6 +5568,13 @@ message (@code{gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original}).  This command uses
 the process/prefix convention, but only uses the headers from the
 first article to determine the recipients.
 
+@item S L
+@kindex S L (Summary)
+@findex gnus-summary-reply-to-list-with-original
+When replying to a message from a mailing list, send a reply to that
+message to the mailing list, and include the original message
+(@code{gnus-summary-reply-to-list-with-original}).
+
 @item S v
 @kindex S v (Summary)
 @findex gnus-summary-very-wide-reply

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we listed those
revisions in full, above.

Summary of changes:
 lisp/ChangeLog   |    5 +++++
 lisp/gnus-msg.el |   11 +++++++++++
 texi/ChangeLog   |    5 +++++
 texi/gnus.texi   |    7 +++++++
 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "Gnus Project".

The branch, master has been updated


hooks/post-receive
-- 
Gnus Project
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.