Re: Replies, (very) wide replies, yanking, and the prefix argument

Eric Abrahamsen <[email protected]> writes:

Hi Eric,

> I'm surprised that no one hit this bug before, and I'm not sure what to
> do with it. We have "S V" (gnus-summary-very-wide-reply-with-original)
> that uses the prefix argument correctly *and* yanks message content
> correctly, so I'm not sure there's a need for "S v" to handle the prefix
> argument both ways. I suppose I could make it handle the prefix argument
> both ways, though.
>
> Let me know if anyone has any thoughts on this.

I don't know anything about the implementation in Gnus. But as a data
point, we have also the 'S w' and 'S W' key bindings in the Summary
buffer. And 'C-u S w' seems to behave correctly. Perhaps you could
compare how those commands are implemented?

Best regards, Michael.