Re: Updating definition of "bogus" groups?

> This seems like it would be more handy for cleaning up "dangling"
> groups.
>
> Does anyone have an opinion on that idea, one way or the other?

I would remove the term `bogus` altogether, it's too vague, and replace
it with something more descriptive.  This is independent from the fact
that the behaviour could be more useful, as you describe.

-- 
Alberto