Re: Has lexical binding declaration format changed in Emacs 30 or 31?
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.help |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aZ9NHFyMgM/[email protected]> |
On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 01:50:38PM -0500, Pierre Rouleau wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 12:50 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 12:17:47PM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > > > Pierre Rouleau <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > > ;;; gnu-elpa-keyring-update.el --- Update Emacs's GPG keyring for GNU > > ELPA > > > > -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- > > > > > > > > Note that the original line is not wrapped. It was wrapped by email. > > > > - I see a newline in the Pierre's example. I assumed it was just MUA > > wrapping, > > but worth checking anyway > > > > There's no new line in the original line. Its MUA wrapping induced as you > guessed. I guessed that much... > > > > - Pierre's example has a semicolon after the value (i.e. t;). This should > > be > > harmless (and local testing confirms that), since it'd be a separator for > > more buffer-local variables, but who knows... > > > > I tried removing the semicolon and byte compiling. There were no warnings. > I added it back and byte compile again: still no warning. ...same here. So both weren't successful leads, sorry. [...] Strange. I'm out of ideas... Cheers -- t
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCaZ9NFQAKCRAFyCz1etHa RrD7AJ4rR46AZWYx5S+44AIABxDFw2nfhgCfYfH8HW5fYXPGr2BG3WENCqqHHws= =48k7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----