Re: Has lexical binding declaration format changed in Emacs 30 or 31?

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.help
Message-ID <aZ9NHFyMgM/[email protected]>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 01:50:38PM -0500, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 12:50 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 12:17:47PM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> > > Pierre Rouleau <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > > > ;;; gnu-elpa-keyring-update.el --- Update Emacs's GPG keyring for GNU
> > ELPA
> > > >  -*- lexical-binding: t; -*-
> > > >
> >
> 
> Note that the original line is not wrapped.  It was wrapped by email.
> 
> 
> > - I see a newline in the Pierre's example. I assumed it was just MUA
> > wrapping,
> >   but worth checking anyway
> >
> 
> There's no new line in the original line.  Its MUA wrapping induced as you
> guessed.

I guessed that much...
> 
> 
> > - Pierre's example has a semicolon after the value (i.e. t;). This should
> > be
> >   harmless (and local testing confirms that), since it'd be a separator for
> >   more buffer-local variables, but who knows...
> >
> 
> I tried removing the semicolon and byte compiling.  There were no warnings.
> I added it back and byte compile again: still no warning.

...same here. So both weren't successful leads, sorry.

[...]

Strange. I'm out of ideas...

Cheers
-- 
t
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCaZ9NFQAKCRAFyCz1etHa
RrD7AJ4rR46AZWYx5S+44AIABxDFw2nfhgCfYfH8HW5fYXPGr2BG3WENCqqHHws=
=48k7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.