Re: Printing an alist of plists with cons format

>> ((:cm :10pt 283.46456 :pt 28.34646 :mm 10 :in 0.3937 :ft 0.03281)
>>  (:in :10pt 720 :pt 72 :mm 25.4 :cm 2.54 :ft 0.083333)
>>  (:ft :10pt 8640 :pt 864 :mm 304.8 :cm 30.48 :in 12))
>>
>
> That's a list of lists, not really an alist.  Try improving the code above
> to produce this form:
>
> ((:cm (:10pt 283.46456 :pt 28.34646 :mm 10 :in 0.3937 :ft 0.03281))
>  (:in (:10pt 720 :pt 72 :mm 25.4 :cm 2.54 :ft 0.083333))
>  (:ft (:10pt 8640 :pt 864 :mm 304.8 :cm 30.48 :in 12)))))

I disagree.  The first above is an "alist of plists" while the
alternative you propose would be an "alist of (singleton) lists of
plists".

E.g. `(alist-get :in ...)` would return

    (:10pt 720 :pt 72 :mm 25.4 :cm 2.54 :ft 0.083333)

for the first and

    ((:10pt 720 :pt 72 :mm 25.4 :cm 2.54 :ft 0.083333))

for the second


=== Stefan