Re: Advicing the `interactive' form of a command

On Sun, May 03 2026, Stéphane Marks wrote:
> If you put a print statement in your advice, you'll see
> it does work for sure.

For me, the print statement happens to late: from what I can tell,
the advice goes around the body of the adviced function.  So I can
print, in particular, the args passed to the body.

> But I sense that maybe you want to advise 'read-buffer-to-switch
> instead.  Give that a try and see if that does what you're looking
> for.

Thanks, this is indeed a clean solution for my particular problem
that works as expected.  However, this will not work for other commands
if the command uses a more sophisticated interactive spec without
delegating this work to a separate noninteractive function like
`read-buffer-to-switch'.