Re: How to make Emacs more secure?
<[email protected]> Sun, 17 May 2026 15:19:37 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.help |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 03:01:41PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > On 2026-05-03, at 10:37, Stéphane Marks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Aside from a baseline "audit," this feature coming in Emacs 31 will help for package upgrades. AFAIK, the same does not exist > > in VSCode and if that's an approved tool, then Emacs, used correctly, should exceed VSCode's default security posture. > > As I said in the previous message, not necessarily. `emacs --eval` can > do /everything/ the user can do. I am not sure if a typical editor/IDE > like VSCode can do the same - it's possible these tools have some sort > of sandboxes Emacs doesn't have. I don't think so, not by default. VSCode downloads whatever it needs via npm, the user gets to pick and choose their extensions, which live "out there". > Also, a rogue package is not necessarily the biggest security risk. > A rogue skill and a coding agent writing some malicious Elisp might be > a bigger issue. With npm, where's the difference, though? Cheers -- t
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCagnAYgAKCRAFyCz1etHa RtHVAJ9uiJu6rpkgAxFSgw4pi7vmOMSVWQCeMPPM+prlSfYNGlFaaNWFN58ccUs= =7V5H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----