Re: Improved patch to jde-wiz.el (for deep inner-class names)

Tell me more.
You say there is a problem with "error handling",
but what error is being handled?
For me, with ZCat.java compiled and ZCat$FooBar.class on the class path,
it works.

The *first* time i tried your test, my prj.el had a wrong classpath,
and bsh had been working on other projects,
so FooBar was not found (but even then a single, simple message)
but after clearing that, it works as expected.

Looks like either the patch is incorrecly installed or your JDEE-bsh is
confused about what is where...?
That [1220 times] and "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size"
message looks like runaway recursion, signs of a bad patch...
the real code could not do that [TTBOMK].
Maybe revert to 164 and try again? (patch attached)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Len Trigg" <[email protected]>
To: "Jeff Peck" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [jdee-devel] Improved patch to jde-wiz.el (for deep inner-class 
names)


> Jeff Peck wrote:
>> Improved patch to jde-wiz.el, so implement-interface can find deeply 
>> nested class/interface.
>> (recurse, replacing last '.' with '$' until class is found)
>
> Needs some improvement to error handling. I tried invoking
> jde-wiz-implement-interface FooBar from within Blah in the following
> small test file I had around.
>
> Before the patch:
>
> error : (error "Error: could not find interface named: ZCat.FooBar. Note: 
> name must be qualified.") [2 times]
> error : (error "Error: could not find interface named: ZCat$FooBar. Note: 
> name must be qualified.") [2 times]
> Error: could not find interface named: ZCat$FooBar. Note: name must be 
> qualified.
>
>
> After the patch:
>
> error : (error "Error: could not find interface named: ZCat.FooBar. Note: 
> name must be qualified.") [2 times]
> error : (error "Error: could not find interface named: ZCat$FooBar. Note: 
> name must be qualified.") [1220 times]
> error in process filter: typep: Variable binding depth exceeds 
> max-specpdl-size
> error in process filter: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size
> error : (error "Error: could not find interface named: ZCat$FooBar. Note: 
> name must be qualified.") [2 times]
> error in process filter: byte-code: Variable binding depth exceeds 
> max-specpdl-size
> error in process filter: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size
> error : (error "Error: could not find interface named: ZCat$FooBar. Note: 
> name must be qualified.")
> error in process filter: apply: Variable binding depth exceeds 
> max-specpdl-size
> error in process filter: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size
> error in process filter: timer--time-less-p: Variable binding depth 
> exceeds max-specpdl-size
> error in process filter: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size
> error : (error "Error: could not find interface named: ZCat$FooBar. Note: 
> name must be qualified.")
> error in process filter: typep: Variable binding depth exceeds 
> max-specpdl-size
> error in process filter: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size
> error : (error "Error: could not find interface named: ZCat$FooBar. Note: 
> name must be qualified.")
> error in process filter: eieio-validate-slot-value: Variable binding depth 
> exceeds max-specpdl-size
> error in process filter: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size
>
> And I get left at a minibuffer prompt "Lisp expression:"
>
>
> Cheers,
> Len.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july