Re: Bugs introduced that affected jde-import-all
"Eric M. Ludlam" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.jdee.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The CVS version has many bug fixes, and passes the test suite in more Emacs variants of Emacs than pre6. CVS is labeled as pre7 which I'm very close to releasing when I can find a moment or two, and pre7 is (based on reports) quite stable and likely to become 1.0. Eric Paul Landes wrote: > I'll be upgrading to 1.0pre6. Is this the version in Emacs? > > On Jan 9, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Eric M. Ludlam wrote: > >> >> >> Paul Landes wrote: >>> On Jan 8, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Len Trigg wrote: >> >>>> The main problem seems to be with the wisent 1.5 grammar, and I didn't >>>> back out that change immediately after my email about it because I was >>>> hoping that someone more familiar with how jdee and semantic interact >>>> would investigate and find the solution (in other respects the new >>>> grammar is much better when dealing with modern Java code). >>> It would be great if someone was available to do that. I'd buy them >>> dinner. Until that happens, I suggest we leave this until we upgrade >> >> What state are you in. :) >> >>> to the newest cedet. I understand it's baked into Emacs 23 (or will >>> be in some point release) so perhaps moving to it when it does would >>> be the easiest path. >> >> What version of CEDET are most people using? The Emacs 23.2 CEDET is >> the same as the CVS CEDET which I hope to post a new tarball of soon. >> If there is a CEDET issue, I'd like to fix it soon so it can get into >> 23.2. >> >> Thanks >> Eric > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev