Re: Call to Fork or simply for JDEE TODO items

Paul Landes writes:

> . . .

> Again, I have thought about forking/canabalizing etc.  The primary
> motivation is that the project is large and very dependent on CEDET.
> I have nothing bad to say about CEDET but it's current integration
> with Emacs post 23 has been non-compat and created a lot of issues
> for installation.

If Shyamal's comments are representative, this point is of limited
relevance, but I would add to what you say above the datapoint that I
spent a full day over the weekend attempting to get a version of the
current CEDET (from the bzr repo) to load into XEmacs (21.5 beta 33)
and failed miserably.  XEmacs compatability is clearly not on the
CEDET agenda at all.  I'm not coding in Java right now myself, but
when I get back to doing so I'd be sorry if JDEE had become an
Emacs-only toolset. . .

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: [email protected]
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr